Boko Haram Doesn’t Respond to #Hashtags

   The tone of this article is not in line with other articles published in this blog. This blog means to side with the impoverished, the oppressed, the victims... when giving ideas for a better education or commenting on different issues.

   The person who writes the article below centres his analysis on how the USA has tackled the drama of the Nigerian girls' kidnapping to the detriment of the USA and what should be done in the interest of this country. Notwithstanding, it serves the purpose of explaining the reason for the international uproar over this case. 

Extract from: The Daily Caller

By Joseph Miller

On the evening of April 14, 2014, Boko Haram, a Nigerian Islamic terrorist group with links to al-Qaida kidnapped 276 school girls. The group initially said it took the girls so that they could become wives to its members. The group has changed its mind twice in the last two weeks, though, and has since offered to either sell the girls or trade them for imprisoned Islamic terrorists.

In the time since the incident took place, the world has expressed outrage over the incident — though the supposedly outraged nations have taken little action to address the situation. The kidnapping has galvanized the American public in particular, and it has become a trending topic on social media. Despite the uproar, the Obama White House has refused to take military action.

Why advocate for military action in Nigeria? While it is terrible that Boko Haram has kidnapped a large group of school girls, does the U.S. really have a national security interest in Nigeria? The answer is simple: Yes.

The United States has a national security interest in Nigeria and in countering and ultimately neutralizing nascent terrorist groups like BokoHaram. That interest is oil. Nigeria is the single largest producer of oil in Africa, and at one time was the world’s fourth-largest producer of liquid natural gas. The West African country is a member of OPEC and has been, up until recently, a relatively stable democracy. Additionally, Nigeria has not suffered from many of the issues that have caused instability in the Middle East, and has maintained good relations with the United States.

Nearly all of Nigeria’s fossil fuel deposits are located in the southern half of the country, which is predominantly Christian and peaceful. For these reasons, Nigeria seemed to be a viable alternate source of oil imports for the U.S., in order to reduce the nation’s dependence on Middle Eastern oil. Middle Eastern oil has served as a catalyst or at least a contributing factor into the decision to initiate conflict in the Arab world. Those wars have been costly in terms of blood and treasure. Diversification could reduce the likelihood that the nation is forced to fight one of these conflicts again and allow the country to focus on limited counter-terrorism operations instead.

In 2001, the George W. Bush administration joined previous Democratic and Republican administrations in concluding that energy import diversification was one of the steps required to increase American energy security. Bush’s National Energy Policy Development Group, led by then-Vice President Cheney, recommended that the U.S. increase its oil imports from countries like Nigeria in order to achieve diversification goals and reduce dependency on Middle Eastern oil. That dependency has made the U.S. vulnerable to rapid and significant decreases in supply as the Middle East has been plagued by instability.

Analysts have concluded that West African oil could account for 25 percent of all oil imported to the United States. However, terrorist attacks committed by groups like Boko Haram in the north, and the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta in the South, have significantly reduced Nigeria’s daily production of oil and its security. For these reasons, the Obama administration should have been paying closer attention to the security situation in Nigeria and should have taken decisive clandestine military action a long time ago. It should not have taken the kidnapping of 276 school girls for Obama’s foreign policy team to realize that we have a problem in Nigeria.

The Democratic political machine decided the best way to solve the crisis was to send the first lady out to do the president’s job while his administration can’t seem to figure out what its foreign policy doctrine is, let alone a specific policy toward Nigeria. This is par for the course for an administration that has bungled every major national security problem that it has faced since taking power.

The first lady’s response was to launch an Internet-based social media appeal to free the kidnapped school girls using the hashtag #BringBackOurGirls. I hate to break it to Michelle Obama, but al-Qaida-affiliated terrorist groups like Boko Haram don’t respond to hashtags or change.org petitions. Only the might of the U.S. military and intelligence community has been capable of halting terrorist actions like these.

To make matters worse, the social media campaign has only drawn international attention to what was a local terrorist group, which analysts fear could further embolden the group and increase its ability to recruit. That would help the group grow in size and stature to the point where it could be capable of conducting international operations, possibly against the United States. It is essential to nip groups like Boko Haram in the bud before they become a threat to the United States, which, by the way, is now one of the group’s long-term, stated goals.

To be fair, the White House also announced that it was sending a team of military and law enforcement specialists to advise the Nigerians, and manned U.S. spy planes have joined the hunt. However, you can count the number of people that make up this team on two hands. Clearly this is not sufficient to deal with the situation. The longer the situation drags on and the more media attention the situation receives, the harder it will be to clandestinely prosecute this local terror group with prejudice until it is gone. The first lady’s social media campaign and the subsequent media frenzy have now made this task more difficult and time-sensitive.

Mr. President, for the sake of our nation’s energy security, our national security, and yes, those school girls too, please log off of Facebook and Twitter and pick up the phone, call the Pentagon, and sign the order to quietly end this situation. If you don’t, it will almost certainly escalate, and Boko Haram becomes too big to fail — rising from a local movement to an international terrorist actor. The later are much harder to kill.

Joseph Miller is the pen name for a senior Department of Defense official with a background in U.S. special operations and combat experience in Iraq and Afghanistan. He has worked in strategic planning.